AI-powered review by Reviewer3.com. Every endorsed paper is eligible for AI review. AI reviews are free while supplies last.
How it works
Screen
Every submission is automatically screened by AI for basic academic substance. Papers that pass enter the public pipeline.
Endorse
A verified ORCID scholar endorses the paper, signaling it merits deeper review. Community comments are open throughout.
AI Review
Multiple AI reviewers via Reviewer3.com evaluate the paper. Authors revise and respond, up to three rounds.
Peer Review
Human peer reviewers evaluate the work. Coming in the future.
ForthcomingAccepted
Formally accepted by the editorial board after full review. Coming in the future.
ForthcomingThis journal is governed by its community
Every rule above — cooldowns, endorsement thresholds, revision limits, deadlines — can be changed by community vote. Log in with your ORCID, review the rules, and cast your votes. The option with the most votes at the end of each voting period becomes the active rule.
View & Vote on RulesPipeline
View all →All
AI Reviewed
Soft Inflatable Robotic Systems for Space Applications: A Survey
cats: Flight Mechanics, Robotics, Robotics
Soft inflatable robotic systems and structures are emerging as transformative technologies for space applications, offering compelling advantages in mass efficiency, compact stowage, compliance, and adaptability over traditional rigid-body systems. This survey provides a comprehensive review of the intersection of soft robotics, inflatable structures, and space engineering, organised around a unifying...
AI Reviewed
The Cultural Cost of Overwork: Evidence from Switzerland’s Röstigraben
cats: Causal Inference, Panel Data Analysis
Does culture shape how burdensome overtime work feels to workers? We exploit Switzerland’s linguistic border, the Röstigraben, where French- and German-speaking workers share the same labor laws but inherit different attitudes toward work and leisure. Using data from the Swiss Household Panel (1999–2023), we show that each extra hour beyond...
AI Reviewed
Searching for Sleep: What Digital Trace Data Reveals About Infant Sleep Difficulty
When do babies sleep worst? Population-level data on this question is scarce: clinical studies use small samples, and parent diaries are subjective. We use Google Trends data for age- specific sleep search terms (“K month old sleep,” K = 1–24) at weekly resolution across the US (2024–2026) as a revealed-preference...
AI Reviewed
Attention Inequality on X/Twitter: Evidence from English-Language Posts
cats: Computer Networks, Technology and Society
Every day, hundreds of millions of posts compete for a finite resource: human attention. We present a descriptive analysis of how this resource is distributed among English-language posts on X (formerly Twitter), drawing on a cross-sectional sample of 8,722 tweets (February 2026, after bot filtering), a timeline panel of 17,671...
In Review
Thinking for Oneself and Obeying the Commands of Duty: Resolving an Apparent Tension in Kantian Ethics
cats: Moral Philosophy, Normative Ethics
Kant’s moral philosophy appears to generate a tension between two central commitments: the demand that individuals “think for themselves” and act according to their own principles, and the requirement that they act in accordance with moral duties. This paper examines whether this tension constitutes a genuine contradiction. First, it identifies...
Linguistic Markers of Suicide Ideation: A Comprehensive Analysis with Evidence from African Digital Contexts
cats: Natural Language Processing, Psychological Assessment
Suicide remains a critical global public health challenge, with over 700,000 deaths recorded annually worldwide (World Health Organization, 2021). The proliferation of digital communication platforms has provided researchers with unprecedented access to linguistically rich data through which suicidal ideation may be detected and studied. This paper presents a comprehensive analysis...
Copyright in AI-Generated Works and International Law Issues: A Quest for a Mediation-Based Solution
The proliferation of Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems in the production of text, images, music, and software has intensified discussions at both national and international levels regarding how the concepts of "work," "authorship," and "ownership" should be interpreted within human-centric copyright regimes. This article examines issues such as whether AI-generated outputs...
Redesigning Paper as the Unit of Scholarly Intermediaries
The traditional academic paper was designed as a human-readable unit of knowledge under conditions of textual scarcity and print-based dissemination. In an era in which artificial intelligence increasingly generates, summarizes, ranks, and synthesizes research, the paper is no longer merely a vessel of communication but a machine-mediated intermediary. This article...
The Paradigm Shift in Health Sciences Literature: Charting the Future of Large Language Models in Scientific Publishing
cats: Artificial Intelligence, Health Policy
The exponential expansion of biomedical literature, coupled with the growing demand for rapid clinical knowledge dissemination, has created an unsustainably high workload for researchers, peer reviewers, and journal editors. Large Language Models (LLMs) represent a transformative architectural pivot capable of automating, optimizing, and reshaping workflows across the health sciences publishing...
JAIGP welcomes contributions from all fields. Have a side project idea you never had time to develop? A hypothesis you wanted to explore? Collaborate with AI, submit the paper, and see what the review process reveals.