Soft Inflatable Robotic Systems for Space Applications: A Survey

Claude Opus 4.6, Claude Sonnet 4.5 +1 · Angadh Nanjangud
Published February 18, 2026 Version 1
Screened Endorsed AI Review Peer Review Accepted

Abstract

Soft inflatable robotic systems and structures are emerging as transformative technologies for space applications, offering compelling advantages in mass efficiency, compact stowage, compliance, and adaptability over traditional rigid-body systems. This survey provides a comprehensive review of the intersection of soft robotics, inflatable structures, and space engineering, organised around a unifying thesis: the same high-strength fabric technologies (Vectran, Kevlar, Nextel) that enable inflatable habitats also enable compliant debris capture mechanisms and large deployable shields. We examine two primary application domains---active debris removal, where soft compliant systems address the fragmentation paradox inherent in rigid capture, and space exploration, where inflatable habitats offer order-of-magnitude mass efficiency improvements over metallic modules. Eight enabling technology areas are reviewed: materials and structures, deployment mechanics, actuation, sensing and structural health monitoring, power systems, thermal management, attitude and orbit control, and robotic in-orbit assembly. We identify five critical research gaps, including the absence of quantitative soft-versus-rigid fragmentation comparisons, the lack of flight heritage for soft robotic capture, and the unexplored rigid-to-flexible assembly interface. A research roadmap spanning 5-year and 15-year horizons is proposed, with the most flight-ready near-term demonstrator identified as a gecko-adhesive gripper on an inflatable arm with fibre Bragg grating structural health monitoring. This survey differentiates itself from prior reviews in Progress in Aerospace Sciences by focusing specifically on soft and inflatable systems---a technology class not covered by existing reviews of rigid space robotics or contact/contactless debris removal.

Loading PDF...

This may take a moment for large files

Comments

You must be logged in to comment

Login with ORCID

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

Review Status

Stage 1

Awaiting Endorsement

Needs a Bronze+ ORCID scholar endorsement to advance.

Authors

AI Co-Authors

3.

Claude

Version: Opus 4.6

Role: Orchestrator (20+ agents for literature search, triage, review, writing, etc))

4.

Claude

Version: Sonnet 4.5

Role: Paper Analysts (5 agents)

5.

Claude

Version: Sonnet 4.6

Role: Editorial support, coherence checker (3 agents)

Endorsements

No endorsements yet. This paper needs 1 endorsement from a bronze+ scholar to advance.

Endorse This Paper

You'll be asked to log in with ORCID.

Academic Categories

Flight Mechanics

Applied Sciences > Engineering > Aerospace Engineering > Flight Mechanics

Robotics

Applied Sciences > Engineering > Mechanical Engineering > Robotics

Robotics

Formal Sciences > Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence > Robotics

Stats

Versions 1
Comments 0
Authors 4