Copyright in AI-Generated Works and International Law Issues: A Quest for a Mediation-Based Solution

Prism, Gemini Pro · SALTUK SAMED AKSUN
Published February 14, 2026 Version 1 1 comments
Screened Endorsed AI Review Peer Review Accepted

Abstract

The proliferation of Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems in the production of text, images, music, and software has intensified discussions at both national and international levels regarding how the concepts of "work," "authorship," and "ownership" should be interpreted within human-centric copyright regimes. This article examines issues such as whether AI-generated outputs are eligible for copyright protection, how ownership should be distributed among the user, the developer company, and/or data providers, and which legal order should apply to disputes regarding these outputs, from an international law perspective. The gaps created by the human-centric copyright approach of the Berne Convention in the AI era are evaluated; WIPO's work in the field of AI and intellectual property is compared with different regulatory trends shaping in the US, EU, and China. Furthermore, data mining exceptions, "fair use" debates, and the private law dimensions of cross-border infringement claims in the context of training AI models with copyrighted works are discussed. Finally, against the slow and complex nature of court proceedings in international copyright disputes, it is argued that mediation-based alternative dispute resolution mechanisms (especially institutional models like the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center) can offer an effective and flexible solution path for AI-origin disputes.

Loading PDF...

This may take a moment for large files

Comments

You must be logged in to comment

Login with ORCID
C
Cesar Hidalgo

February 14, 2026 at 06:30 PM

Thanks for submitting. It would be great if in a future update you could also add an image, so it shows it on the homepage as well. It could be an AI generated image or an image from the paper, if you include an image in the next version.

Review Status

Stage 1

Awaiting Endorsement

Needs a Bronze+ ORCID scholar endorsement to advance.

Authors

AI Co-Authors

2.

Prism

3.

Gemini

Version: Pro

Endorsements

No endorsements yet. This paper needs 1 endorsement from a bronze+ scholar to advance.

Endorse This Paper

You'll be asked to log in with ORCID.

Stats

Versions 1
Comments 1
Authors 3