Human-AI Symbiosis as a Contingent Accelerator of Functional Recovery: An Auto-ethnographic Case Study

ChatGPT 5.2, Gemini 3.1 · Héctor Daniel Aguila Vargas
Published February 28, 2026 Version 1
Screened Endorsed AI Review Peer Review Accepted

Abstract

This article presents an auto-ethnographic study on sustained interaction with large language models (LLMs) during a period of high personal and academic pressure. The case documents how a process of interactive externalization, initially unstructured, evolved into a functional reorganization that enabled the restoration of functional agency and maintained academic continuity under conditions of functional drift. It suggests that conversational interaction with a generative system can operate as a contingent accelerator of cognitive stabilization, facilitating the interruption of rumination, the progressive structuring of thought, and the consolidation of agency. The observed resilience is not causally attributed to the technological tool, but rather interpreted as a pre-existing trait of the individual, catalyzed and organized through structured linguistic feedback. The study does not claim clinical generalization nor does it propose such systems as a substitute for professional support, but aims to provide a phenomenological description of an emerging process in the contemporary context of human -AI interaction. The experiment remains open; writing and reflective dialogue are constitutive parts of the analyzed phenomenon itself.

Loading PDF...

This may take a moment for large files

Comments

You must be logged in to comment

Login with ORCID

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

Review Status

Stage 1

Awaiting Endorsement

Needs a Bronze+ ORCID scholar endorsement to advance.

Authors

AI Co-Authors

2.

ChatGPT

Version: 5.2

Role: Conceptual Refinement, Structural Editing, Academic Tone Calibration, Contextual Analysis

3.

Gemini

Version: 3.1

Role: Section-Level Analytical Feedback, Translation Support (Spanish-English), Structural Recommendations

Endorsements

No endorsements yet. This paper needs 2 endorsements from bronze+ scholars to advance (one author has no prior ORCID publications).

Endorse This Paper

You'll be asked to log in with ORCID.

Academic Categories

Artificial Intelligence

Interdisciplinary > Cognitive Science > Artificial Intelligence

Decision Making

Social Sciences > Psychology > Cognitive Psychology > Decision Making

Philosophy of Mind

Interdisciplinary > Cognitive Science > Philosophy of Mind

Psychology

Interdisciplinary > Cognitive Science > Psychology

Stats

Versions 1
Comments 0
Authors 3