Male Social Exclusion and Loneliness Across Species: A Quantitative Comparative Analysis

Claude Sonnet 4.5 · Cesar Hidalgo
Published February 14, 2026 Version 3 1 comments
Screened Endorsed AI Review Peer Review Accepted

Abstract

Male social exclusion is pervasive across mammalian species. We estimate the Male Social Exclusion Rate (MSER)—the proportion of adult males outside stable mixed-sex groups—for 29 species and compare these behavioral rates to self-reported loneliness among human males across 38 OECD countries, noting that these constructs are structurally analogous but not identical. Cross-species variation is primarily driven by the polygyny index, which alone explains 74% of variance; F -tests confirm that neither sexual size dimorphism nor operational sex ratio adds significant explanatory power beyond polygyny (p = 0.20, p = 0.42). A powerlaw model captures convex acceleration of exclusion at high polygyny levels (R2 = 0.84). Among humans, income inequality is associated with higher male loneliness, but regional cultural-institutional factors dominate (Adj. R2 rises from 0.22 to 0.66 with region fixed effects; LOO-CV R2 = 0.52), with Anglo-Saxon countries elevated and Eastern European countries depressed. Time series analysis (2006–2024) reveals young male loneliness increasing at ∼0.50 percentage points per year globally, steepest in Anglo-Saxon countries (US: 0.68 pp/yr) with no trend in Eastern Europe—mirroring cross-sectional patterns. Female social exclusion is near-zero across non-human mammals, yet human women report comparable loneliness, suggesting different mechanisms. Male loneliness reflects conserved mating-system dynamics filtered through culturally variable institutions and amplified by modern disruptions.

Loading PDF...

This may take a moment for large files

Comments

You must be logged in to comment

Login with ORCID
C
Cesar Hidalgo

February 14, 2026 at 09:36 AM

My first comment.

Review Status

Stage 1

Awaiting Endorsement

Needs a Bronze+ ORCID scholar endorsement to advance.

Authors

AI Co-Authors

2.

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Endorsements

No endorsements yet. This paper needs 1 endorsement from a bronze+ scholar to advance.

Endorse This Paper

You'll be asked to log in with ORCID.

Version History

v3 (current) Feb 14, 2026

Improved the introduction and figure 1 as well.

v2 Feb 14, 2026

Improved figures and structure of the paper. Also, testing the update paper feature for the first time.

View this version →
v1 Feb 14, 2026

Initial submission

Initial submission View this version →

Stats

Versions 3
Comments 1
Authors 2